KomAInu helps teams building critical software verify the consistency between requirements, tests, and code faster and more safely, so they can detect coverage gaps, inconsistencies, or non-compliance risks before they become audit, certification, or delivery problems.
Built for safety-critical standards
Traditional verification bottlenecks leave coverage blind spots and burn review cycles before certification.
Requirement-to-test links live in fragile sheets that drift as soon as code or the SRS changes.
Teams inspect every artifact by hand instead of focusing on the findings that actually matter.
Missing coverage surfaces in audits and certification reviews, when it costs the most to fix.
Four questions connect KomAInu's solutions to real verification work: trace every requirement with the AI Requirements Traceability Matrix, identify untested behavior with Test Coverage Gap Analysis, close validated gaps with AI Test Case Generation, and keep changes aligned with the AI Compliance Reviewer.
Map requirements and evidence, audit coverage gaps, remediate missing tests, and prevent regressions with requirement-aware pull request reviews in one connected workflow.
MAP
Build an AI requirements traceability matrix that maps SRS requirements to tests, code, documentation and audit evidence, so every link remains reviewable and bidirectional.
Verification workflow
Establish a connected verification baseline, identify the gaps that matter, then turn validated findings into concrete test and traceability updates.
One living traceability context: Requirements ↔ Tests ↔ Code ↔ Documents ↔ Decisions
01
Audit
Analyze requirements, tests, code, documentation and requirements traceability matrices as one connected verification context. Coverage findings stay visible in the KomAInu console.
02
Remediate
Use any MCP-capable agent (Cursor, Claude, Codex, OpenCode) to turn reviewed coverage findings into test work, then sync results back into KomAInu after approval.
Continuous prevention
AI Compliance Reviewer is a dedicated application that carries the same requirements, standards, and evidence into every future pull request.
KomAInu reviews every pull request in the context of your requirements and standards, so teams can catch compliance gaps and business or regulatory regressions before merge, propose corrective changes, and keep the audit trail current as the software evolves.
Every pull request
Ground each review in the same requirements, standards, evidence, and internal records used across verification and certification.
Engineering evidence
Two controlled engineering benchmarks examine the traceability engine and the requirement-aware reviewer on documented evaluation setups.
TraceFuse benchmark
On LibEST, a dual TRIAD prior plus a small-model backward pass reached AP 48.60% and MAP 63.30% for requirement-to-test linking.
Read the TraceFuse benchmark48.60%
AP
63.30%
MAP
Copilot benchmark
On the same deliberately difficult pull request, KomAInu found all 10 planted vulnerabilities while GitHub Copilot found 4 to 7.
Read the Copilot benchmark10 / 10
KomAInu
4–7 / 10
Copilot
Start with the workflow that addresses your current bottleneck, then extend across the same connected requirements, tests, code, and evidence.
Traceability foundation
Connect requirements to tests and evidence in a bidirectional, audit-ready matrix.
Explore solutionCoverage analysis
Identify potentially uncovered requirement aspects and prioritize verification work.
Explore solutionTest remediation
Turn validated coverage gaps into candidate test cases and code, then update traceability under human review.
Explore solutionContinuous review
Review every pull request, propose corrective changes, and keep traceability and compliance records current.
Explore solutionKomAInu isn’t AI built by outsiders guessing at how regulated software works. It’s built by engineers who have spent years developing critical software under the very standards our product serves, writing it, verifying it, and shipping it where a requirement gap is not an option.
Our team brings together two former Thales software engineers and an AI engineer from Arkhn, combining deep expertise in aerospace software, software verification and validation, and AI applied to highly regulated industries. We’ve worked to standards like DO-178C, ISO 27001, HDS and HL7 FHIR, so we understand your constraints, because they were ours.
KomAInu secures the consistency between requirements, tests, code, documentation, and the requirements traceability matrix across the software development lifecycle. The workflow covers three stages: audit, remediation, and prevention. First, KomAInu analyzes your requirements, tests, code, documentation, and RTM to detect coverage and traceability gaps, then justifies every finding with evidence. Second, it helps remediate the gaps by generating missing tests and scripts, suggesting corrections in your ALM, and updating traceability. Third, it helps prevent the same issues from coming back by checking every pull request, detecting business and regulatory regressions, and alerting before integration.
Yes. KomAInu can run on-premise or inside a private infrastructure so sensitive requirements, source code, tests, and compliance documents do not have to leave your environment. This matters for safety-critical, defense, healthcare, aerospace, automotive, railway, and other regulated teams that cannot send confidential engineering data to a public SaaS or uncontrolled model endpoint. We adapt the deployment to your security constraints, your data-governance rules, and the tools your team already uses.
KomAInu is model-agnostic. It can work with private or open-source models deployed in your own environment, including model families such as Mistral, Qwen, and similar self-hostable models, depending on the accuracy, latency, cost, and security profile your project requires. The important point is that the model is not the product boundary. KomAInu provides the traceability workflow, retrieval context, scoring, evidence structure, and review process around the model, so the solution can be tuned to your needs instead of forcing every team into the same hosted AI setup.
Yes. KomAInu is designed to adapt to your project rather than replace your whole V&V process. We configure the solution around your standards, your requirements format, your test repositories, your ALM, and the way your team reviews and approves evidence. For example, one team may need DO-178C requirement-to-test traceability, another may need ISO 26262 coverage analysis, and another may need pull request compliance checks against internal rules. The underlying platform stays the same, but the workflow, connectors, review gates, and outputs are adapted to the certification or compliance problem you actually need to solve.
KomAInu is built to sit on top of existing engineering and ALM workflows. It can read requirements, tests, code, documentation, and traceability artifacts, then suggest corrections, generate missing test material, and keep the traceability view current after human review. The goal is not to make teams rebuild their process from scratch. KomAInu connects the audit, remediation, and prevention loop around the tools already used by the project, so approved changes can flow back into the ALM or repository while the existing system of record remains in place.
No. KomAInu is built as an engineering assistant for regulated software, not as an automatic certification authority. It detects gaps, proposes tests, suggests corrections, updates traceability, and reviews pull requests, but engineers remain in control of what is accepted. That human review gate is important because safety-critical verification still depends on engineering judgement. KomAInu reduces the manual search and documentation effort, surfaces the risky inconsistencies earlier, and prepares evidence, while your team validates the output before it becomes part of the official project record.
You can reach the team at pierre.lammers@komainu-ai.com.
The KomAInu team is based in Paris, France.
Identify potential coverage gaps and verification issues before audits and certification reviews.
Learn what IVVQ is
